<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: File Transfer Disk Space Tip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelinuxblog.com/disk-space-tip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelinuxblog.com/disk-space-tip/</link>
	<description>The Linux Blog, General Linux, Shell Scripts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 01:16:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://www.thelinuxblog.com/disk-space-tip/comment-page-1/#comment-6374</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelinuxblog.com/#comment-6374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yes df -h is a much better option, and the reason is that it takes almost no time to complete, compared to du that can take forever, especially when dealing with huge numbers of small files.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes df -h is a much better option, and the reason is that it takes almost no time to complete, compared to du that can take forever, especially when dealing with huge numbers of small files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
